SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 25988

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.ASHA, J
BHAVANA M P – Appellant
Versus
A DEVIKA    Advocate -SRI V A MUHAMMED – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 31212/2016



The court upheld that appointments must follow the prescribed ratios of appointments by transfer and direct recruitment, confirming the seniority-based entitlement of candidates under the K.E.R.

Headnote:

Appointment - H.S.S.T (Junior) - K.E.R Chapter XXXII - The court clarified the method of appointment for H.S.S.T (Junior) by emphasizing the need to maintain proper ratios of transfer versus direct recruitment as specified in the rules, ultimately determining eligibility based on seniority.

Fact of the Case:

The case involves multiple writ petitions related to the appointment of H.S.S.T (Junior) positions in a school, focusing on the proper application of government orders and special rules regarding appointments by transfer and direct recruitment.

Issues: Whether the appointments to the H.S.S.T (Junior) posts were made in compliance with the prescribed ratios and rules outlined in the K.E.R.

Ratio Decidendi: The ratio of appointments by transfer to direct recruitment must be maintained as per the K.E.R regulations, and the senior qualified candidate was entitled to the position due to the misapplication of those rules by the Manager.

Final Decision: W.P.C Nos. 31848/16 and 31212/16 are dismissed and W.P.C No. 30573 is allowed.

JUDGMENT

All these writ petitions relied to the appointment to the post of H.S.S.T (Junior) in English in the Moothedeth Higher Secondary School. W.P.C No. 30573/16 is filed for implementation of the Government order in which the appointment of H.S.S.T (Junior) was directed to be made in accordance with the Special Rules in accordance with the ratio 1:4 on the cadre strength. According to which, the appointment to the post of H.S.S.T (Junior) is to be appointed by transfer. While Smt Devika, who is the senior most qualified H.S.A in the School claims appointment against the vacancy in the School on account of creation of the post in the year 2011-12. Smt.Bhavana, who is the petitioner in W.P.C No.31412/16 has filed the writ petition to sustain her appointment made by the Manager with effect from 13.6.2013. The Manager has also filed W.P.C No. 31248/16 challenging the Government Order and denial of approval to the appointment granted to Smt. Bhavana. The Government sanctioned 10 posts of H.S.S.T (Junior) and one post of H.S.S.T in the year 2010-11 to the School. It is note in dispute that the appointment to the said post were made in accordance with law. According to the Manager appoints of 7 posts were made by direct recruitment and 3 by transfer. 2. In the year 2011-12, the Government sanctioned two additional posts of H.S.S.T (junior) while upgrading 6 posts of H.S.S.T (junior) as H.S.S.T. As a result of these upgradation and sanctioned the total number of post become 10+2-6 i.e., 6. But, the Manager appointed Smt. Bhavana on 13.6.2013. That appointment was not approved by the Regional Deputy Director of Education. However, the Regional Deputy Director took a different view that there were altogether 13 posts of H.S.S.T in this School and the 12th and 13th posts sanctioned by the Government on 23.02.2013 should not have been divided by the Manager as English and Commerce. The Manager as well as the teacher took up the matter before the Director. The Director also took up the very same view and first post should have been filled up by transfer category and remain 75%, i.e., 3 posts should be filled up by direct recruitment and out of the 13 posts, 4 should be filled by transfer category. The petitioner took up the matter before the Government and Government pass orders as per Ext.P7, in which also Government considered all the posts that is of H.S.S.T (junior) as well as H.S.S.T together and ordered that 4 posts should have been filled up by transfer category and hence the rejection of approval to the appointment of Smt. Bhavana was upheld. Smt. Bhavana filed W.P.C No.5380/15 challenging Ext.P7 order. By Ext.P5 judgment, this Court held that cadre strength of H.S.S.T (junior) and H.S.S.T cannot be clubbed together and all the authorities have issued orders on erroneous application of the rules. Therefore, after quashing Ext.P7 order, the Government was directed to pass a fresh orders. Thereafter, the Government issued Ext.P10 order from 31.08.2016, in which in paragraph 4 Government stated as follows:

“Moothedeth High School was upgraded as a Higher Secondary School during the academic year 2010-11 with initial sanction of two batches and consequential sanction of one post of HSST and 10 posts of HSST(junior). The manager appointed one HSST by direct recruitment and 3 HSST(junior) by transfer under the 25% quota. In the second year of sanction of Higher Secondary batches to the school ie., during 2011-12, out of the 10 posts of HSST(junior), 6 posts were upgraded as HSST. Therefore, there are 4 posts of HSST (junior) continuing from 2010-11 onwards. Out of this, 4 HSST (junior), one HSST(junior) belonged to the by transfer category. During the same year consequent on the sanction of one additional batch, two more posts of HSST (junior), (ie.,one post each of HSST (junior) in English and Commerce), the cadre strength of HSST (junior)was enhanced to 6 as against the pre-existing 4 posts of HSST (junior). It is seen that out of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top