SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 25503

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, J
KONNOTH ASHRAF – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AGENCY AND ENVIRONMENT CENTREKSRSEC – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 26054/2017



Legal proceedings on land utilization must comply with specific assessment requirements as per applicable statutory provisions.

Headnote:

Land - Property Rights - Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act Section 5(4)(i) - The court emphasized the need for proper assessment and report before considering land use applications, underscoring legal compliance with land classification regulations.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the classification of their co-owned lands as 'nilam' in village records which are not included in the draft data bank prepared under relevant acts and sought timely consideration of their application regarding land utilization.

Issues: Whether the application regarding land utilization can be decided without necessary reports on the property's classification and status as per the relevant legislation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that due diligence in assessing land classification is crucial and established that necessary procedural steps must be followed before deciding on land use applications.

Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of with directions for necessary assessments to be conducted.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the lands, co-owned by the petitioner, having a total extent of 5.76 Ares comprised in Re-Survey No.385/1-6, 14.16 Ares comprised in Re-Survey No.385/1-7, 4.66 Ares comprised in Re-Survey No.385/1-4 and 7.99 Ares comprised in Re-Survey No.385/1-5 in Block No.22 of Urangattiri Village, is shown as 'nilam' in the village records and basic tax register. The property of the petitioner is not included in the draft data bank prepared under Section 5(4)(i) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. The petitioner's property is lying as a pucca garden land and there are big residential buildings in the adjacent properties, is the contention raised. The petitioner filed Ext.P4 application, before the 1st respondent, which is pending consideration. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), the 1st respondent herein, to consider and dispose of Ext.P4, an application filed under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967, (for brevity “KLU Order”), within a reasonable time.

2. Since the land is not included in the draft data bank and the description is shown as 'nilam' in the Basic Tax Register (B.T.R), it is only proper that a report is received from the Local Level Monitoring Committee (LLMC) and Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC) before consideration of Ext.P4 application by the 1st respondent, if the same is filed in original and pending before the authority.

3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition before the Agricultural Officer, the Convener of the LLMC, along with the copy of the Field Measurement Book and Survey and Sub-division numbers with respect to the property obtained from the concerned Village Officer. The Agricultural Officer shall then seek a report of the lie and nature of the property as it remained on the date of coming into force of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, from the Director, Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC), Vikas Bhavan, C-Block, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 033. On the direction of the Agricultural Officer so to do, the petitioner shall remit the required fees in the name of the petitioner, C/o. the concerned Agricultural Officer (showing the full address) before the KSREC for obtaining such report and produce such receipt before the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer shall then obtain the report and map from the KSREC, who shall issue the same on the strength of the receipt produced by the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer, on receipt of the report, shall require the LLMC to conduct physical inspection of the property and submit a report before the RDO as to the lie and nature of the property, as it exists at present, along with the report from the KSREC. A copy of the report of physical inspection conducted by the LLMC and of the report of the KSREC shall be issued to the petitioner on an application made.

4. On receipt of the report of the LLMC, along with the satellite map and report forwarded by the KSREC, the 1st respondent shall issue notice to the petitioner and consider the application, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report of the Agricultural Officer.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top