SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 62044

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. Dias, J
Suhaib E.K – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 6132 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Amina Akthar
For the Respondents: Devadas H Mallan

A petition to quash criminal proceedings may be dismissed if the petitioner fails to comply with a court direction to surrender and obtain bail, though liberty may be reserved to file a fresh petition upon the petitioner's return to the jurisdiction.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Proceedings - Non-compliance with court direction to surrender - Petition dismissed when petitioner is unable to surrender due to being abroad, while reserving the right to move a similar petition upon return and obtaining bail. (Para 3, 4)

Issues: Whether the petition to quash the final report can be entertained when the petitioner fails to comply with the direction to surrender and obtain bail.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • practice and procedure
    • criminal procedure
      • quashing of proceedings
      • bail
      • surrender
      • non-bailable warrant

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.09.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2026

ORDER

This petition is filed to quash Annexure B final report and all further proceeding in LPC No. 54/2025 in C.C.No. 1669/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Taliparamba.

When this petition came up for consideration on 23.07.2026, this Court taking note of the fact that there is a non-bailable warrant issued against the petitioner and the case against him has been transferred to the Long Pending Register, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Balmukund Singh Gautam V. State of Madhya Pradesh [2026 KHC 6125], directed the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within two week from the date of order and get himself enlarged on bail.

Today, when the petition was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was unable to comply with the interim order dated 23.07.2026, as he is abroad and there is no definite time period within which he will return to India.

Taking into consideration the above submission, this petition is dismissed, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to move a similar petition for an identical relief, after the petitioner returns back to India and get himself enlarged on bail. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel for the petitioner in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top