1. Petitioner sought directions to maintain existing Devaswom Vigilance Investigation Team at Sabarimala during gold theft investigation. (Para 1 )
Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 62358
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, K. V. Jayakumar, JJ
K. Surendran – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 32699 OF 2026
Important Points
The Court held that where judicial monitoring of officer tenures is already in place and directions have been issued to ensure continuity in an investigation, a petition based on mere apprehension from media reports is misconceived.
Subject
Civil Law - Writ Petition
Headnote
(A) Writ Jurisdiction - Monitoring of Investigation - Apprehension of altering investigation team - Where the Court is already monitoring the tenure of officers and specific directions have been issued to ensure continuity, a petition based on media reports alleging violation of such directions is misconceived. (Para 4, 5)
Issues: Whether the existing composition of the Devaswom Vigilance Investigation Team at Sabarimala should be maintained until the completion of the investigation.
Issues: Whether the existing composition of the Devaswom Vigilance Investigation Team at Sabarimala should be maintained until the completion of the investigation.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
practice and procedure
-
writ petitions
- maintainability (Para 5)
-
writ petitions
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N.J. Ashwin, G. Sreekumar (Chelur), Vishnu Pradeep
For the Respondents: G. Biju, K.R. Sunil
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N.J. Ashwin, G. Sreekumar (Chelur), Vishnu Pradeep
For the Respondents: G. Biju, K.R. Sunil
Table of Contents
2. Petitioner alleged violation of court directions; respondents presumably opposed the petition as misconceived. (Para 3 )
3. Court had already monitored tenure extension of officers and issued specific directions in prior proceeding. (Para 4 )
4. Apprehension of petitioner was misconceived as court had already issued appropriate directions on the matter. (Para 5 )
5. Writ Petition closed as petitioner's apprehension was found to be misconceived. (Para 5 )
6. Can a court close a writ petition when the petitioner's apprehension is based on media reports and the court has already issued directions?
Yes, if the court has already monitored and issued specific directions on the subject matter, the petitioner's apprehension based on media reports is considered misconceived. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 )
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J.
The petitioner, who claims to be a Hindu devotee and follower of Lord Ayyappa, has approached this Court seeking directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 7 not to replace, transfer or substantially alter the existing Devaswom Vigilance Investigation Team functioning at Sabarimala during the pendency of the investigation into the alleged gold theft, loss, misappropriation and connected irregularities. One of the prayers is to direct the respondents to maintain the existing composition and continuity of the Investigation Team, including the officers whose tenure has been extended pursuant to the orders passed by this Court in SSCR No. 21 of 2026, until completion of the investigation.
2. We have heard Sri. G. Sreekumar (Chelur), the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Devaswom Board, and the learned Special Government Pleader.
3. It appears that the petitioner has approached this Court on the basis of a news item published in the media, alleging that, in violation of the directions issued by this Court in SSCR No. 21 of 2026, certain actions were being taken by the police.
4. This Court has been monitoring the extension of tenure of the officers in the Devaswom Vigilance, and specific directions have been issued in SSCR No. 21 of 2026 with regard to the extension of the tenure of officers till 31.01.2027 and the appointment of one Sub-Inspector. Orders in tune with the directions have also been issued.
5. In view of the above, we are of the view that the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is misconceived.
The Writ Petition is closed.
