1. Application for pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of BNSS alleging physical assault and wrongful restraint within an educational campus resulting in student injuries. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 )
Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 74831
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
Suman Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 6772 OF 2026
Important Points
Pre-arrest bail may be granted when the accused is a student with no criminal antecedents, is not alleged to have used a weapon, and custodial interrogation is deemed unnecessary by the court.
Subject
Criminal - Bail
Act Referred
Headnote
(A) Criminal Procedure - Pre-arrest Bail - Determination of necessity for custodial interrogation - Where the accused is a student, no weapon is alleged to have been used by the specific applicant, and there is a counter-case, custodial interrogation may be deemed unnecessary. (Para 6)
Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to pre-arrest bail considering the nature of the allegations and his background as a student.
Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to pre-arrest bail considering the nature of the allegations and his background as a student.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kodoth Sreedharan
For the Respondents: Thomas Sabu Vadakekut
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kodoth Sreedharan
For the Respondents: Thomas Sabu Vadakekut
Table of Contents
2. Applicant contends false implication and lack of evidence, while prosecution argues that the intentional criminal act necessitates denial of bail to preserve the investigation. (Para 5 )
3. Court observed that the applicant lacks criminal antecedents, the incident involved students on campus, and the absence of weapons used by the applicant renders custodial interrogation unnecessary. (Para 6 )
4. The absence of criminal antecedents combined with the lack of weapon usage and the student status of the parties warrants pre-arrest bail, provided conditions ensure investigative integrity. (Para 6 )
5. Application allowed; applicant granted pre-arrest bail subject to executing a bond with solvent sureties and complying with investigative requirements and prohibition against interfering with witnesses. (Para 6 )
6. What factors justify the grant of pre-arrest bail in cases of alleged physical assault?
The court considers factors such as the absence of criminal antecedents, the nature of the involvement (e.g., whether a weapon was used), and the necessity of custodial interrogation for investigation. If the investigation does not require custody, personal liberty is favored via bail conditioned on cooperation. (Para 6 )
7. Does being a student in a campus dispute influence the court's decision on pre-arrest bail?
Yes. When both the accused and the victim are students on the same campus, the court examines the context of the incident and the severity of the allegations. A lack of prior criminal history and the circumstances of the incident can support a decision to grant bail over custodial detention. (Para 6 )
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.453/2026 of Vidyanagar Police Station, Kasargod District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 110 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 07.10.2026 at 12.30 P.M, the accused Nos.1 to 5, who are workers of the SFI, and 20 other identifiable persons wrongfully restrained the defacto complainant, who is a student in the Government ITI, Kasaragod, Chala in Kasaba Village and who was a worker of MSF. The accused No.1 with dangerous weapon punch hit on the head of the defacto complainant which was prevented by him or otherwise the blow would have hit on his head and he would have died by fracture of skull. The applicant, with his hands caused injuries to the defacto complainant and when the friend of the defacto complainant came to prevent him, the accused No.1, by securing the iron stick from the applicant, hit the said friend with the iron stick and the accused Nos.3 to 5 beat the defacto complainant with their hands and thereby committed the above said offences.
4. I have heard Sri. Kodoth Sreedharan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. Thomas Sabu Vadakekut, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.
6. The applicant, the remaining accused and the defacto complainant are students. The incident took place inside the campus. There is no allegation that the applicant used any weapon. There is a counter case as well. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.
In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.
(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.
(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.
(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.
(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.
(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.
(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.
