HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Mr.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
SREE MARUTHI AGROTECH PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU – Respondent
ORDER
The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the impugned order dated 19.12.2024 issued by the 4th respondent and to quash the same and further direct the respondents 1 to 3 to award compensation payable to the petitioner in terms of G.O.(MS).No.63 dated 22.11.2017 and G.O.(Ms).No.86 dated 30.10.2019.
2. Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a lessee and was cultivating salt in the lands allotted to him by way of the lease by the appropriate Department. While so, the respondents 2 and 3 have entered into the said lands and have also disposed the petitioner of certain extent and erected towers. There are other losses for the petitioner also. When the petitioner claimed compensation, the same was not considered. Under the circumstances, the petitioner earlier approach this Court in W.P.No.25019 of 2022 and by an order dated 22.12.2023, this Court found on merits that the petitioner will be entitled to compensation and it is not enough that the concerned department issues No Objection Certificate to the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein and in that regard directed the Collector to reconsider the entire issue wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.