Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
R.Vijayakumar, J
Veerappan – Appellant
Versus
Rejeswari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in title declaration and possession case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding additional document admissibility. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on document genuineness and trial considerations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final decision on petitions and costs. (Para 8) |
C O M M O N O R D E R
The defendants in O.S.No.84 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Pudukkottai, are the revision petitioners herein.
2. The respondent herein as the plaintiff had filed the above said suit for the relief of declaration of title and recovery of possession. After the closure of the evidence of P.W.1, the case was posted for further evidence on the side of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed in I.A.No.247 of 2022 to recall P.W1 and I.A.No.248 of 2022 has been filed to seek permission of the Court to recieve additional documents. These two applications came to be allowed.
Challenging the same, the present Civil Revision Petitions have been filed.
3. According to the learend counsel appearing for the revision petitioners, there are no pleadings in the plaint relating to the additional documents that are sought to be presented before the Court. Therefore, the Cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
