O R D E R

“IT IS IMPORTANT TO TREAT OTHERS IN THE SAME WAY AS WE LIKE TO BE TREATED”.

The resolution dated 7th April, 2023 passed by Nainarkuppam Village Panchayat and the representation sent by the writ petitioner to the District Collector, dated 18.08.2023, provided cause for the institution of the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. The President, Nainarkuppam Village Panchayat, Cuddalore District is the petitioner and states that no patta shall be granted to the Transgender persons (transmen or transwomen) in their Village. The petitioner along with the village people, in their representation, has stated that allowing Transgender persons in the Village will result in destruction of culture in that locality. Nearby the land proposed to be allotted to the Transgender persons by the District Collector, a Bus Stand situates, where from, School and College going children will get affected. Nearby the said proposed land, village people are residing and in the event of allowing the Transgender persons to reside in that locality, the same would be detrimental to the future life of the youngsters in the Village. Therefore, the writ petitioner / President, Village Panchayat, requested the District Collector not to grant patta to the Transgender persons in their Village.

3. This Court passed an interim order directing the petitioner to produce the copy of the Resolution passed by the Village Panchayat. The petitioner produced the copy of the Resolution along with an affidavit, stating that the 1st respondent / District Collector, Cuddalore District issued a show cause notice on 16.08.2023 and the petitioner has given a reply on

18.08.2023.

4. The petitioner has stated that he has chosen to withdraw the writ petition. The objectionable Resolution was passed without knowing the Rights of the Transgender persons. Admittedly, the 1st respondent issued a show cause notice under Section 46(1)(a) and the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994. However, the petitioner has raised an objection stating that patta has been granted to houseless poor citizens of the Village by the Government to the inhabitants of the particular Village, based on the identity records like Voters list, Family Card, Aadhar Card etc. Therefore, the case of the Transgenders cannot be considered for grant of free house site patta even under the Government Schemes. It is apparent that on receipt of the show cause notice from the District Collector, the petitioner has offered to withdraw the present writ petition.

5. Social evil in any form is unconstitutional and the resolution passed by a Village Panchayat unanimously cannot be taken in a lighter manner. Allowing the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition would result in acceptance of the social evil caused at the instance of the elected body. The Constitutional Courts are failing in its duty to protect the Constitutional Mandates, Philosophy and Ethos, if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be allowed to walk away simply by withdrawing the writ petition filed seeking a direction to the District Collector not to grant patta to the Transgender persons in their Village under the Government schemes.

6. Section 3 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, enumerates prohibition against discrimination, which reads as under:

“No person or establishment shall discriminate against a transgender person on any of the following grounds, namely:

(a) the denial, or discontinuation of, or unfair treatment in, educational establishments and services thereof;

(b) the unfair treatment in, or in relation to, employment or occupation;

(c) the denial of, or termination from, employment or occupation;

(d) the denial or discontinuation of, or unfair treatment in, healthcare services;

(e) the denial or discontinuation of, or unfair treatment with regard to, access to, or provision or enjoyment or use of any goods, accommodation, service, facility, benefit, p