SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12703

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Mrs. Justice T.V. Thamilselvi, J
A.PALANISAMY – Appellant
Versus
K.PRABHAKARAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.P.Wesley Isaac, Mr.S.Senthil

JUDGMENT

The dispute is with regard to 8 cents. According to the appellant, he is in possession and enjoyment of 8 cents, after selling a portion of the properties to the respondent, in the year 1985. The appellant sold only 2 acres of lands to the Vendors in 1984 and he retained 8 cents on the South East side. The remaining extent of 1 acre and 32 cents which is adjacent to the disputed land was sold to another third party that is the Eastern side of the disputed land.

2.The learned counsel for the respondent contended that though the extent was granted in 2 acres of lands but with a specific four boundaries the land was conveyed by the appellant to original purchaser Kannammal of the year 1984.

3.The respondent's father purchased the property from the original vendor Kannammal under a Sale Deed in the year 1985 to an extent of 2 acres with specific four boundaries. Thereafter, from 1995 onwards, after demise of the respondent's father, the respondent is enjoying the property through Ex.A3 – Will executed by his father. In the year 2018, Ex.A5 - Joint patta was issued in respect of S.No.27/4B in favour of both the respondent and the appellant. Thereafter, the dispute arose between th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top