SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11410

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


O R D E R

This Criminal Revision Petition is filed against the order dated

02.01.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.03 of 2024 in S.C.No.66 of 2022 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Denkanikottai.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the de-facto complainant in Crime No.323 of 2020 dated 08.05.2020 on the file of the respondent-Police. On completion of investigation, final report was filed on 02.01.2021 and the same was taken on file by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Denkanikottai in S.C.No.66 of 2022. He further submitted that during the investigation, the respondent-Police found CCTV footage, which would disclose the movement of the petitioner and the accused, who followed him before committing the offence. Though the CCTV footage was recovered by the respondent-Police, it does not form part of the records accompanying the final report. Therefore, the petitioner filed an application for production of documents under Section 91 Cr.P.C., but the same has not been entertained by the Court below. Hence, the petitioner filed a petition invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., in Crl.O.P.No.10972 of 2024 before this Court, seeking a direction to the trial Court to number

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top