SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 877

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
C.SHANMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
CHINNAPAIYAN – Respondent


JU D G M E NT

This appeal is preferred against a judgment and decree dated

07.09.2011 in O.S.No.190 of 2010 passed by the learned Additional

District and Sessions Judge (FTC No.2) Salem.

2.The plaintiffs are the appellants. The plaintiffs filed the above suit in O.S.No.190 of 2010 for partition in the suit property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the suit property.

3.The case of the plaintiffs is that, the plaintiffs are brothers and the

1st defendant is the father of the plaintiffs and their mother is one Kamala. The 2nd defendant is the son of the 1st defendant born through one Pappa, a concubine of the first defendant herein. The 1st defendant lived with his concubine along with the 2nd defendant. The suit properties are the joint family properties of the 1st defendant and his father Chinnusamy and his elder brother Kandhasamy. They divided the properties under a registered partition deed dated 30.04.1979. In that partition deed the properties described in the A schedule were allotted to Chinnusamy and his wife Arayee to be enjoyed by them for life without any right of alienation, and after the life time of Chinnusamy and his wife Arayee the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top