SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17288

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
RAJKANNAN M/A 32 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The Appellant is the sole Accused in Spl.S.C.No.2 of 2015 dated

27.12.2017 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Salem.

2. The Trial Court, vide impugned judgment dated 27.12.2017, has convicted the Sole Appellant/Accused as follows : -

Conviction under section Sentence Awarded
417 IPC To undergo one year of rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment.
406 IPC To undergo three years of rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default, to undergo six months simple imprisonment.
506 (1) IPC To undergo two years of rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment.
10 POCSO Act, 2012 To undergo five years of rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default, to undergo six months simple imprisonment.

Accused is not found guilty of the offence under Sections 294(b) of IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top