HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J
VIMALA – Appellant
Versus
Home Prohibition and Excise Department – Respondent
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
The petitioner herein is the son of the detenu viz., Ajith @ Saranraj, male aged 22 years S/o. Kumar, who is confined at Central Prison, Salem, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent in C3-D.NO. 23/2024 dated 20.05.2024.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in passing the order of detention.
4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 26.03.2024 and thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 20.05.2024. This fact is not disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
5. In the case of ' Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura ', reported in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay from the date of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise, between the date of detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that the live and proximate link, between the grounds and the purpose of detention, stands snapped in a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.