SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12520

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
M/S. ZAK EXPORTS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE TAX OFFICER – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

In all these writ petitions, the petitioner challenges assessment orders relating to payment of interest and penalty in so far as such assessment orders relate to imposition of GST on reverse charge mechanism on seigniorage fee, lease charges and payments made to the District Mineral Fund (DMF).

2. Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He has placed on record the recent judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions, A.Venkatachalam v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Palladam II Assessment Circle, Palladam, W.P.Nos.30974 of 2022 batch. In the said judgment, the following directions were issued at paragraph

9 thereof:

"9. In these circumstances, we deem it fit and appropriate to issue the following directions:

(i) In the cases, where the challenge is made to the show cause notices, the writ petitioners shall submit their objections / representations within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(ii) Upon receipt of the objections / representations from the wrt petitioners, the authority concerned shall proceed with the adjudication, on merits and in accor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top