SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17970

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
S.Chandran – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar – Respondent


ORDER

By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. Challenging the refusal slip issued in refusing to register the sale deed dated 01.07.2021, the present writ petition is filed.

3. It is the case of the writ petitioner that originally an extent of 4.97 acres owned by the S.Chandran and E.Dhanalakshmi, out of which 37 cents have already been sold. Though original sale was intended to form a layout, however, the layout has not been confirmed since no permission was obtained. The property remained as an agricultural land. Further, the petitioners have intended to sell the remaining extent of 2.23 acres, when the document was presented, the same was refused to be registered on the ground that since some of the properties have been dealt as a layout, the approval of the layout of the entire properties has to be produced. Challenging, the same the present writ petition has been filed.

4. In the counter, it is the stand of the respondent that the lands in S.Nos.121/3, 121/4, 121/5, 121/6, 121/7 and 121/8 of Katheri Village were plotted out and sold as plots, under the name and style of MGR Nagar & Annai Nagar. The guide line value for the above said S.No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top