HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J
PALANIAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION – Respondent
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The facts are not in dispute between the parties. Four Settlement Deeds were registered by the 3rd respondent in favour of her Daughters in Document Nos.3000 of 1991, 8449 of 2013, 8451 of 2013 and 8452 of 2013 on 27.09.2011, 14.03.2013. Three Settlement Deeds were executed in favour of the appellant herein. Subsequently, the Settlement Deeds executed in favour of the appellant were unilaterally cancelled by the 3rd respondent through Cancellation Deeds dated 01.09.2016 in Documents Nos.13549, 13550 and 13551 of 2016.
2. Mr.Gouthaman, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that unilateral cancellation of Settlement Deed is impermissible in view of the judgement of the Full Bench of this Court. The learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition relying on the Judgement of the Division Bench in the case of the P.Rukmani and others -vs- Amudhaveni and others vide order dated 17.07.2019 in W.A.No.229 of 2018. The said Judgement cannot be relied upon in view of the ratio laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Latif Estate Line India Ltd., -vs- Mrs.Hadeeja Ammal reported in (201
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.