ORDER

This criminal original petition is filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the respondent is harassing the petitioner based on the complaint of third respondent. The action of the respondent police is in violation of the Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Hence, he filed this petition.

3.In support of his contention, the learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the following decisions:- (i) Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another (2015-1-L.W.(Crl.) 318), (ii) L.N.Nithyanantham vs. the State and others (Crl.O.P(MD)No.1776 of 2021, (iii) Dorand and others vs. the Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil and other another [2016(2)CTC 286:

(2016)2 MLJ CRL 437], (iv) Shanmugavadivel and others vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni and another [2015-2-L.W.(Crl.) 627], (v) Jagdish Shrivastav vs. the State of Maharashtra and another [S.L.P (Crl.)No.1758 of 2022]

and (vi) Abhyanand Sharma @ Tinku Sharma vs.

State of Bihar and another [W.P.(Crl)No.420 of 2021]

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respon