Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar, JJ
S.Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and procedural history of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding harassment allegations and legal precedents (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. factual findings on harassment and summary nature of proceedings (Para 11) |
| 4. court’s observations on interpretation and essence of the senior citizens act (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. final conclusion dismissing appeal and affirming lower orders (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
Under assail is the order dated 09.09.2024 in W.P.No.32738 of 2022.
2. The matter arises under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (herein after referred as Senior Citizens Act).
3. The writ petitioner is the appellant before this Court. The appellant is the son of the third respondent. The third respondent / Senior Citizen instituted a complaint before the competent authority under the Senior Citizens Act seeking cancellation of the Settlement deed executed by her, in favour of her son/appellant on the ground that she was neglected by her son, after getting the Settlement deed executed by force and coercion.
4. The competent authority/Revenue Divi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
