O R D E R

This revision has been filed against the dismissal of the petition filed by the defacto complainant/Bhuvaneswari under Section 319 Cr.PC to add one Tamilarasan as additional accused. Despite the matter being listed on 15.12.2020, 04.01.2021 and 22.01.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Further, perusal of the records would show that notice taken from the Registry on the counsel for the petitioner viz., Mr.Balaguru and Mr.Rajmohan has also been returned.

2. On the earlier occasion, it was submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the case is of the year 2016 and the Sessions case was taken up in SC.No.2 of 2016 and examination of witnesses was over as early as in the year 2016 and the case has been posted for questioning the accused under Section 313 Cr.PC and due to the pendency of this revision before this Court, there is no progress in the trial.

3 .The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the name of Tamilarasan was originally included in the FIR based on the complaint. However, after investigation and further based on the statement of Venkataraman and Vediappan finding that Tamilarasan was not involved in