SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 22436

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
K.CHANDRASEKHARAN – Appellant
Versus
H.H.THE PRINCE OF ARCOT – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The appellant K.Chandrasekharan is the legal representative of the second defendant in O.S.No.1777 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli. The said suit was instituted by the first respondent herein namely H.H.The Prince of Arcot represented by his agent for recovery of rent for faslis 1401, 1402 & 1403 with interest. In the suit, the defendants filed their written statements denying their liability to pay rent. The defendants took the stand that the suit property is not the property of the plaintiff and that it belonged to one M.L.Venkatachalam Pillai and that from the said Venkatachalam Pillai, they had purchased the property vide sale deed dated 18.07.1956. The defendants further pleaded that there is no tenancy agreement with the plaintiff. They further claimed that they are having settlement patta issued by the Assessment Settlement Officer, Thanjavur. Based on the rival pleadings, the trial Court framed the necessary issues. On behalf of the plaintiff, an official of the endowment was examined as P.W.1. Ex.A1 to Ex.A12 were marked. The second defendant Arumugam Pillai examined himself as D.W.1 and Ex.B1 to Ex.B6 were marked. The learned tria

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top