SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 48970

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mrs Justice TV. THAMILSELVI
K.MURALI – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER O – Respondent


O R D E R

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.133 of 2018 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu, which was registered based upon the complaint given by the informant/R2, by invoking the provisions of The SC/ST Act.

2. The petitioner seeks to quash the proceedings pending against him on the following grounds:-

(i) No offence made out as against the petitioner (ii) No sanction for prosecution (iii) Ulterior motive to wreck vengence (iv) Inherently improbable prosecution (v) Delay in lodging FIR

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

The petitioner herein was working as Assistant General Manager in Air India Limited, Chennai and the informant/second respondent herein was working as Senior Manager (Flight Despatch) in Air India, Chennai (as a sub - ordinate to the petitioner). The Petitioner as AGM of the same section was duty bound to prepare, public maintain roaster of the sub-ordinate to delegate the work. It is a vital section and needs to be manned 24 x7 all 365 days on man-to-man replacement basis. Non-availability of technically qualified officers will affect flight services. The misunderstanding cre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top