SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 10630

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
V.RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
S.N.DEVARAJU – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the concurrent finding of the Courts below for a private complaint filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. The case of the complainant / respondent is that the accused known to him for the past 10 years and he was a tenant under him. To improve his business, he has received Rs.9,00,000/- as hand loan and gave a post dated cheque, dated 19.07.2010. On presentation of the cheque it was returned as 'Funds Insufficient'. After causing statutory notice, a private complaint has been filed for action under Section 138 of N.I.Act.

4. The accused took specific defends stating that on

20.03.2010, he entered into a rental agreement with the complainant in respect of the shop premises owned by the complainant and as per the terms of the rental agreement, the rent was fixed at the rate of Rs.100 per day and an advance of Rs.20,000/- has been agreed to pay. In view of the advance, a blank cheque drawn at IDBI bank bearing No.001227 was issued to the complainant, the said cheque has been misused by the complainant and filled it for R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top