SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 233

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.S. SUNDAR
BAGYALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
N.SARASWATHIAMMAL(DIED) – Respondent


ORDER

(1) This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order in REA.No.159/2018 against the REP.No.24/2018 in O.S.No.125/2010 passed by the Principal Sub Court, Krishnagiri.

(2) Brief facts that are necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition are as follows:

(3) The petitioner, admittedly is a third party to the proceedings in O.S.No.125/2010. The said Suit in O.S.No.125/2010 before the Principal Sub Court, Krishnagiri was filed by the 4th respondent in the Civil Revision Petition for partition of 1/4th share in the Suit property.

(4) It is not in dispute that the Preliminary Decree was granted. It is also not in dispute that after the Preliminary Decree one of the sharers died and therefore, the plaintiff/4th respondent applied for modification of shares and the Preliminary Decree which was passed in the Suit was modified by granting 1/3rd share to the 4th respondent/plaintiff.

(5) It is admitted that the Suit in O.S.No.125/2010 is also for permanent injunction restraining the defendants in the Suit from dealing with the property which is the subject matter of the Suit. Despite the fact, that the Preliminary Decree and a decree for permanent injunction was grante

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top