SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3535

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
H.Parthasarathy – Appellant
Versus
The Executive Engineer(O&M) – Respondent


O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the second respondent to reconnect the disconnected agricultural service connection in the petitioner's land.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the petitioner is the owner of the property in S.No.227/10B and 224A/1, measuring an extent of 0.22 1/2 acres of land situated at Nemili Village and Taluk. He purchased the said property along with agricultural service connection bearing S.C.No.203, and there is also a open well within the property through which, the petitioner is cultivating coconut, mango, quava etc., he is also having 5 H.P.motor therein.

3. According to the petitioner, at the instigation of the third respondent, the second respondent disconnected the service connection, hence he had requested the second respondent to reconnect the service connection, that has been rejected on the ground that, on inspection, it was found there is no well available in the land and the petitioner is also not doing any agricultural operations, hence the service connection cannot be restored. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

4. Mr.G.Jeremiah, the learned counsel appearing fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top