SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11873

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
Y.LAVANYA – Appellant
Versus
M.SENTHIL – Respondent


ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.203 of 2019, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act as against the petitioner.

2. The respondent lodged a complaint for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, alleging that the petitioner approached him for a hand loan to meet out her business needs and borrowed a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- In order to repay the said amount, the petitioner issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-. It was presented by the respondent for collection and it was returned for the reason 'fund insufficient'. Thereafter, the respondent issued statutory notice and lodged a complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is no cause of action to take cognizance on the complaint lodged by the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. The statutory notice issued under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act is not in consonance with the said provision. The notice did not whisper about the payment of cheque amount within the stipulated period. It says immediately

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top