SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14539

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM
Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent


ORDER

This criminal original petition is filed to direct the second respondent to not to interfere in the civil dispute, which is pending before this Court.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent. In this regard, a suit in O.S.No.614 of 1999 had been filed before the II Additional Munsif Court, Dindigul District and the same was decreed in favour of the petitioner's mother. Now, a Second Appeal is pending before this Court. Then, the third respondent approached this Court by filing a petition in Crl.O.P(MD)No.11736 of 2022, seeking a direction to the respondents therein, to take action upon his complaint, dated 11.06.2022. This Court directed the respondent police therein to consider representation of the petitioner/therein. Based on that, the respondent police are harassing the petitioner. Hence this petition has been filed.

3.In support of his contention, the learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the following decisions:- (i) Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another (2015-1-L.W.(Crl.) 318), (ii) L.N.Nithyanantham vs. the State and others (Crl.O.P(MD)No.1776 of 2021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top