HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
SIVA LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
RAJALETCHIMI – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
These revisions are directed against the orders passed in I.A.Nos.3, 4 and 2 of 2020 in O.S.No.363 of 2018 on the file of the Sub Court, Eraniel.
2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff and he filed a suit in O.S.No.47 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Padmanabaphuram claiming the relief of specific performance in pursuance of an oral sale agreement dated 03.01.2010 and for declaration that the settlement deed dated 05.01.2011 executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant is null and void and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing the possession of the plaintiff in the suit property. It is evident that the suit was transferred to the Court of Subordinate Court, Eraniel and the same was taken on file in O.S.No.363 of 2018. It is further evident that when the petitioner’s witness PW.3 was in witness box, the above three Interlocutory Applications came to be filed. The application in I.A.No.2 of 2020 is filed under Section 151 CPC seeking orders to keep the compact CD produced by the plaintiff in safe custody; I.A.No.3 of 2020 is filed under Section 45A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act and under Section 79A of the I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.