SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18482

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
SIVA LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
RAJALETCHIMI – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

These revisions are directed against the orders passed in I.A.Nos.3, 4 and 2 of 2020 in O.S.No.363 of 2018 on the file of the Sub Court, Eraniel.

2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff and he filed a suit in O.S.No.47 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Padmanabaphuram claiming the relief of specific performance in pursuance of an oral sale agreement dated 03.01.2010 and for declaration that the settlement deed dated 05.01.2011 executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant is null and void and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing the possession of the plaintiff in the suit property. It is evident that the suit was transferred to the Court of Subordinate Court, Eraniel and the same was taken on file in O.S.No.363 of 2018. It is further evident that when the petitioner’s witness PW.3 was in witness box, the above three Interlocutory Applications came to be filed. The application in I.A.No.2 of 2020 is filed under Section 151 CPC seeking orders to keep the compact CD produced by the plaintiff in safe custody; I.A.No.3 of 2020 is filed under Section 45A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act and under Section 79A of the I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top