SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21368

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
VIMALA – Appellant
Versus
SURIYA GANDHI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The 4th defendant who unsuccessfully challenged the judgment and decree in O.S.No.81 of 2011 of the Sub Court Mannargudi, before the Principal District Judge, Thiruvarur in A.S.No. 10 of 2018, is the appellant before this Court.

2. For the ease of understanding, the parties are referred in the same array as before the Sub Court, Mannargudi.

FACTS OF THE CASE:

3. The plaintiff has filed a suit for partition of her 1/4th share in the suit property. It is her case that the suit properties belonged to one, Ramaiyan who is the father of the plaintiff and the defendants 1 to 3. Ramaiyan died intestate in the year 1993 and a year later, his wife followed him. Therefore, the plaintiff and the defendants 1 to 3 who are the daughters, had inherited 1/4th share each in the properties.

The deceased Ramaiyan has no male heir.

4. The plaintiff would submit that after the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendants 1 and 3, they have left for their matrimonial home and the second defendant is residing at the old tiled house situated at North Street, Eda Melaiyur Village in the Survey Nos.281/11 B2, 281/14A, 281/14C and 281/14B and maintaining the suit properties.

5. The properties are in the j

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top