O R D E R

(Order of the Court was delivered by V.M.VELUMANI,J.)

The petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in the order bearing Lr.No.12234/nava.6(2)/2022-7 dated 30.11.2022, quash the same and for a direction to the 1st respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.07.2022 in accordance with law and remove the lock and seal of the premises of the petitioner bearing Door No.113, Periyar Pathai West, Arumbakkam, Chennai – 600 106 and permit her to reside therein along with her family members for a specified period.

2.Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents 3 to 5.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 & 2 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 3 to 5 and perused the entire materials on record.

4.From the materials on record, it is seen that the petitioner's husband in the year 2003 constructed a residential building at Door No.113, Periyar Pathai West, Arumbakkam, Chennai – 600 106, without obtaining permission from the authorities. The 5th respondent issued De-occupation notice dated 21.12.2018, under Sections 56 and 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The petitioner filed appeal under Section 80(A) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, before the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent by the order dated 01.10.2019 rejected the said appeal directing the 3rd respondent to initiate further proceedings. The petitioner filed W.P.No.29847 of 2019 challenging the said order. The Division Bench of this Court by the order dated 17.10.2019 dismissed the said Writ Petition. Thereafter the petitioner filed SLP (Civil) No.27198 of 2019 before the Hon'ble Apex Court. The Hon'ble Apex Court by the order dated 22.11.2019 dismissed SLP (Civil) No.27198 of 2019 and granted liberty to the petitioner to file Review Petition before the Division Bench of this Court. According to petitioner, she filed Review Petition and the same is pending in Review Application No.43 of 2020 before this Court. While so, the respondents 3 to 5 evicted the petitioner and her family members and put a lock and seal of the premises.

5.The petitioner filed W.P.No.23457 of 2021 for a direction to the respondents 3 to 5 to remove the lock and seal put up by the respondents 3 to 5. On 27.04.2022, when W.P.No.23457 of 2021 was taken up for hearing, the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Government to de-seal the property. This Court by order dated 27.04.2022 dismissed the Writ Petition as withdrawn and granted liberty to approach the Government. The petitioner gave representation dated 07.07.2022 to the 1st respondent for removal of “Lock and Seal” put up by the respondents 3 to 5. The 2nd respondent by the impugned order dated 30.11.2022 rejected the representation of the petitioner dated 07.07.2022. Hence, the petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given representation to the 1st respondent and the 2nd respondent without any authority has rejected the said representation.

7.From the above facts, it is clear that superstructure put up by the petitioner is without permission and approval and therefore, it is unauthorized construction. The petitioner challenged the De-occupation notice dated 21.12.2018 issued by the 5th respondent under Sections 56 and 57 read with Section 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 before this Court by filing W.P.No.29847 of 2019 and on dismissal of W.P.No.29847 of 2019, the petitioner filed SLP before the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil) No.27198 of 2019. She withdrew the said SLP (Civil) N