ORDER

The petitioner is the founder-trustee of Mustakkuruchi Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar Charitable Trust. It is a registered body. The trust has constructed a community hall bearing Door No.2/68. The trust has resolved to erect the bronze statue of Thiru.Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar in the said campus. Though the petitioner has moved the authorities for erecting the statue, no order was passed till date. The petitioner, therefore, filed WP(MD)No.18056 of 2019 for directing the District Collector, Ramanathapuram to consider granting permission for erection of the statue. The writ petition was disposed of on 20.08.2019 in the following terms :

“13.As has been rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the issue of erecting the statue of a National Leader/freedom fighter in private land/patta land is no longer unsettled as there is no restriction from the side of the Government and in this context, the aforesaid judgments, relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner, have given clear guidelines. 14.In that view of the matter, since the petitioner also wanted to erect the statue of a Freedom Fighter, that too, in a patta land belong to the petitioner, for which, permission has been granted by the village panchayat by passing resolution to that effect in the year 2012 itself, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:-

“that the respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.07.2019 seeking permission to erect and unveil the statue of the Freedom Fighter Thiru.Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar at the private patta land of the petitioner, in the light of the judgments, as referred to above, as well as the Panchayat resolution passed in the year 2012 by the village panchayat concerned and after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, final order shall be passed by the respondent/District Collector, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

2.The direction given by this Court was not complied with. Hence, the petitioner filed Contempt Petition (MD)No.1225 of 2022. The contempt petition was closed in the following terms :

“2.Mr.D.Gandhiraj, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that the contemnor has submitted a detailed report to the Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration on 12.11.2020 and recommended for installing the statue of Thiru.Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar. Further, he has also sent a reminder communication to the Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration on 16.09.2022 to pass final orders on or before 13.10.2022. However, till date no final order has been passed.”

The petitioner was given liberty to approach the Commissioner of Revenue Administration by sending representation. However, till date, no order has been passed on the petitioner's request. That led to the filing of this writ petition.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition and called upon this Court to grant the relief sought for. On the other hand, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that Government Orders issued from time to time have stipulated certain restrictions and that therefore, the petitioner cannot install the statue without getting permission from the Government. He placed particular reliance on G.O Ms No.140 Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department dated 18.12.2009.

4.I carefully considered the rival contentions and went through the materials on record. Since notwithstanding the direction issued by this Court, the authorities have not passed an order, I am inclined to consider the issue on merits. What does the petitioner want? He wants to install the statue of a highly revered freedom fighter and leader in a community hall built on a patta land. Does