SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 9320

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
B.NAWABJAN (DIED) – Appellant
Versus
B.BABAJAN (SINCE DECEASED) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

and C.KUMARAPPAN,J.

This Appeal Suit is filed by the plaintiff, who has lost the suit for partition preferred against his brother. The parties are Muslims and governed by their personal law.

2. The gist of the averments in the plaint is that the suit property morefully described in the plaint was purchased in the name of the first defendant, Babajan on 23.07.1973 from and out of common fund of the family. Thereafter, the plaintiff and the first defendant have jointly improved the property by constructing a building and they were in joint possession and enjoyment of the same. There was no division of the property. While so, in the year 1978, the brothers felt inconvenient to remain in joint possession of the property and therefore, a partition deed was entered into on 02.06.1978, wherein, the plaintiff, the first defendant Babajan and the other brother, Hafeezjan were parties. Accordingly, the suit property was allotted to the plaintiff and the first defendant equally and the said partition deed was duly registered. Since difference of opinion between the plaintiff and the first defendant cropped up, it was suggested to the first defendant to divide the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top