SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 10659

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
K.Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
Prema.M – Respondent


O R D E R

This Criminal Revision case has been filed as against the judgement of confirmation of conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The Trial Court, while convicting the petitioner has sentenced him to undergo six months simple imprisonment and in default to undergo one month simple imprisonment and further, to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

as compensation.

3. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, it is informed by both the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent that during the pendency of this Criminal Revision case, efforts were taken to settle the dispute between the parties and as a result of which, both the petitioner and respondent have filed the joint compromise memo before this Court.

4. On a perusal of the joint compromise memo, it is made clear that the petitioner has paid the compensation amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the respondent and the same was received by her on 05.05.2022 and issued the receipt in a written format to that effect. Both the parties have also been appeared in person before this Court.

5. Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 reads as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top