SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 8499

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
C.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
K.Sethu – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition had been filed to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.3808 of 2023 in C.C.No.51 of 2021 dated 11.01.2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Karaikudi.

2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is arrayed as accused in the private complaint filed by the Respondent under Section 138 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C.No.51 of 2021 and it was pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level) Karaikudi District. The Petitioner is serving as Assistant Professor in a College. He is visually impaired person. The case as per the complaint is that the Petitioner obtained loan from the Respondent, in order to purchase a house plot, for which the Petitioner is alleged to have given a cheque to the Respondent complainant. When the Respondent presented the cheque, the same was returned as “Drawer Signature differs”. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that due to his visual impairment, his account details were maintained by the respondent's son-in-law namely Palaniappan. Hence, the Respondent's son-in-law had il

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top