SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 20185

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR
MAHARAJOTHI P – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


O R D E R

The Writ Petition is directed against the order, dated 02.07.2019 passed by the second respondent and also for directions to the respondents 2 and 3 to hand over the control room of Arasu Cable TV Corporation and the Cable Networks laid thereon and also pay appropriate compensation for the illegal action pursuant to the order of the third respondent, dated 11.01.2012.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3.

3.The case of the petitioner is that she has been operating Multi System Operator (MSO) for Karur District since 1993; that the Cable business run by the Multi System operators was taken over by the Arasu Cable TV Corporation in September 2011 in all 31 Districts except Chennai; that the petitioner was appointed as Multi System Operator by the Arasu Cable TV Corporation, but no formal appointment order was issued; that since more facilities were required for running Arasu Cable, the petitioner had shifted her MSO premises to the building No.1, Asath Road, Municipal Commercial Complex, Karur, which belongs to Karur Municipality; that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top