SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 22829

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
The Managing Director – Appellant
Versus
Sounthamani – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.D.Nitin for Petitioner, Mr.S.P.Yuvaraj for Respondents

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in MCOP No.261 of 2020 dated 18.04.2024 by the learned District Judge, Krishnagiri, dismissing the application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 634 days in filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree dated 20.04.2021 passed in MCOP.

2. The respondents, who are wife, children and parents of one Prabakaran, who died in a road accident on 01.10.2019 involving the bus belonging to the petitioner Transport Corporation, bearing Registration No.TN-29-N-2376, had filed MCOP No.261 of 2020, seeking compensation.

3. It is the case of the petitioner/Transport Corporation that the petitioner had received notice on 12.03.2020 and thereafter, on 12.11.2020, the standing counsel Mrs.N.Kalaiyarasi had appeared before the Tribunal and undertook to file vakalat for the petitioner/Transport Corporation. Thereafter, time was granted from 29.07.2020 to 04.01.2021 to file vakalat along with counter. However, since vakalat and counter were not filed, the petitioner/ Transport Corporation was set exparte on 04.01.2021 and thereafter, exparte order was passed by the Tribunal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top