Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
R.Gnana Sundari – Appellant
Versus
T.Yesuraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under the hindu marriage act not numbered due to alleged religion. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute over marriage solemnization details and expectation of proof by the registry. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal standards differ for hindu and christian marriages. (Para 6) |
| 4. court emphasizes the need to follow petition averments for jurisdiction. (Para 7) |
| 5. the civil revision petition is allowed without costs. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition arises out of the refusal of the Principal Family Court at Chennai to number the petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act , 1955 by the wife.
2. The petitioner and the respondent entered into a matrimony on 23.03.2011. The petitioner would plead that they got married at Bhavani Amman Koil, Mettupalayam, Tiruvallur district. From the wedlock, two children have been born on 16.11.2011. Both the petitioner as well as the respondent are in the Police service.
3. Alleging that the parties to this revision got married according to Christian rites and customs, the husband has initiated a petition for divorce in I.D.O.P.No.1754 of 2019. This petition is pending before the II Additional Family Court, Chennai. On ser
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
