SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 43457

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
M.Duraisamy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


O R D E R

(Through Video Conferencing)

The writ petition on hand has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the 4th respondent and thereby, prevent the 4th respondent from using high volume speakers in the early morning and night hours in their Mosque, by considering petitioner's notice and representation, dated 23.07.2015 and 02.07.2016, respectively.

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that he is residing at Door No.39, Komarapalayam Road, Agraharam Post, Pallipalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District. The 4th respondent Mosque situated nearby gives sermon after 10.00 p.m. and before 05.00 a.m. in the loudspeaker in high volume. The petitioner, at the time of filing of the writ petition, was aged about 68 years, was unable to sleep due to the noise created by the 4th respondent, as the petitioner states the noise created nuisance. Thus, the petitioner sent legal notice through his counsel on 23.07.2015. On receipt of his notice, the 1st respondent/District Collector directed the Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, to take appropriate action. Despite the instructions provided, the 4th respondent Mosque has continued its activity of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top