SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13446

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. SOUNTHAR
SUMATHI AMMAL – Appellant
Versus
USHARANI – Respondent


ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court allowing the application filed by the respondents 1 and 2 seeking to implead them as party defendants in the suit.

2. The petitioners herein filed a suit for partition claiming ½ share against the respondents 3 and 4 in O.S.No.58 of 2008 on the file of learned I Additional Sub-Judge, Cuddalore. A preliminary decree for partition of ½ share was passed in favour of petitioners. When the final decree application was pending, the respondents 1 and 2, claiming themselves as daughters of 3rd respondent and sisters of 1st petitioner's husband one Ramalingam, filed instant application for impleading them as party defendants in the suit. The said application was allowed by the Trial Court and aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondents 1 and 2 were very well aware of the pendency of the suit and they have not taken any steps to implead themselves before passing of preliminary decree. It was also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that subsequent to passing of preliminary decree, the respondents 1 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top