HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. SOUNTHAR
SUMATHI AMMAL – Appellant
Versus
USHARANI – Respondent
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court allowing the application filed by the respondents 1 and 2 seeking to implead them as party defendants in the suit.
2. The petitioners herein filed a suit for partition claiming ½ share against the respondents 3 and 4 in O.S.No.58 of 2008 on the file of learned I Additional Sub-Judge, Cuddalore. A preliminary decree for partition of ½ share was passed in favour of petitioners. When the final decree application was pending, the respondents 1 and 2, claiming themselves as daughters of 3rd respondent and sisters of 1st petitioner's husband one Ramalingam, filed instant application for impleading them as party defendants in the suit. The said application was allowed by the Trial Court and aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondents 1 and 2 were very well aware of the pendency of the suit and they have not taken any steps to implead themselves before passing of preliminary decree. It was also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that subsequent to passing of preliminary decree, the respondents 1 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.