SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18185

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice D. KRISHNAKUMAR
THE CHAIRMAN – Appellant
Versus
K.BALACHANDRAN – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

Challenging the order passed by the writ court in W.P.No. 8135 of

2020dated 04.12.2020, the present writ appeal has been filed.

2. Brief facts:

The respondent has filed a writ petition in W.P.No. 8135 of 2020 challenging the rejection order dated 24.03.2020 issued by the appellants herein on the ground that the respondent has not disclosed his involvement in the criminal case in Crime No. 5 of 2019 in the application from and he was acquitted by the Criminal Court on the basis of benefit of doubt and not on merits. This Court by order dated 04.12.2020 set aside the rejection order passed by the department and directed the department to appoint the respondent to which he is eligible and pass appropriate orders. Challenging the said order this Court, the present writ appeal is filed.

3. The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the appellants has submitted that Rule 14(b)of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service Rules denotes that “A person who is acquitted or discharged on benefit of doubt in a criminal case will be considered as disqualified for selection to the police service and the same cannot be termed as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top