SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13986

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN
Dr.Ganapathi Malarvizhi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

The matter is taken up through web hearing.

In all these writ petitions, the petitioners raised common grounds of challenge with identical and common grievances against the action of the 3rd respondent University and therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of by a common order as under.

2. There are two categories of writ petitioners in this batch, one aspiring to be promoted from the post of Assistant Professor to the post of Associate Professor and the other from the post of Associate Professor to the post of Professor. All the writ petitioners are the faculty of the 3rd respondent, the Anna University.

3. Their common grievance in these writ petitions is that with regard to promotion from the post of Assistant Professor to Associate Professor and from the post of Associate Professor to Professor, the University invited applications from the eligible faculty members for consideration of their claim under Career Advancement Scheme hereinafter referred to CAS. According to these petitioners, they had been invited applications vide communication dated 29.06.2017 and 18.07.2017. The petitioners herein, being fully eligible for consideration in terms of the Career Advance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top