SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 6313

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
ROYAL MANTRA PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commisisoner o – Respondent


O R D E R

Heard Mr. K.R.Samratt, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. R.A.S.Senthilvel, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the Respondents and also perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2. The Writ Petition has been filed to forbear the respondents forbearing the respondents from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business ie., Cross gender massage in the name and style of M/s. Royal Mantra Private Limited at No. 252/34, 35, NM Arcade, Opposite to ARRS Multiplex Theatre, Salem in law full manner.. In support of the aforesaid relief claimed, reliance was placed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner on the decision of this Court in M/s. Masti Health and Beauty Private Limited -vs- Commissioner of Police, Chennai (order dated 09.12.2014 in W.P. No. 24629 of 2014 etc., batch). In that decision, this Court has held as follows:-

"67. In the light of the above, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of to the following effect:-

(i) The Respondents shall not, as a matter of routine and without any basis, conduct any raids and interfere with the business carried on by the Petitioners. (ii) In specific cases where the poli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top