COMMON ORDER

In the above three revision petitions, revision petitioner is the husband and respondent is the wife. Revision petitioner/husband filed I.D.O.P.No.106 of 2013 for divorce. In the said IDOP, husband filed I.A.No.885 of 2013 for interim custody of the female child born to them. Wife filed I.A.No.1192 of 2013 for interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- each to her and her female child and also Rs.1,00,000/- for litigation expenses.

2. The allegation of the husband is that when his wife was pregnant, in July 2010, she went to her parents house and has not returned back. It is alleged that when he visited wife’s place in response to her call on her birthday, he was abused and not permitted to see his child. Finding that he lost all hopes of living a peaceful and happy life, he said to have filed IDOP and sought custody of the female child.

3. On the other hand, denying the allegations of her husband, wife/respondent filed counter in IDOP stating that on 27.3.2011, on the pretext of seeing the child, petitioner/husband came to her maternal home along with his friends and assaulted her father, brother, damaged house hold things. Further, in the IDOP case, she filed petition to trans