SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 37944

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
MOHAMED LATHIFULLA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REPBY – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioners, who are second and third accused in Crime No.171 of 2020 for offences under Sections 143, 145, 147, 290 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, 41, 71A(1) of the Tamil Nadu City Police Act, 1888 and 4B of the Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959, have filed quash petition.

2.The case of the prosecution is that without getting permission of Commissioner of Police, Chennai and knowing very well that under Section 41 prohibitory order issued not to conduct any illegal meeting, procession, fasting, demonstration and human-chain, the petitioners and some others assembled together, raising slogans and protested against the Citizenship Amendment Act enacted by the Central Government, thereby caused nuisance to the public and transportation services. At that time, the respondent asked them to disperse from the said place. But they failed to obey the order, they gathered many more people in that place through the vehicle Tata Ace bearing registration number TN-11-C-7287, they brought food and water bottles for the protestors by more than 10 vehicles. Hence, the respondent registered a case in Crime No.171 of 202 for offences under Sections 143, 145, 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top