SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 33509

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.KIRUBAKARAN
S.VENKATESAN – Appellant
Versus
MINISTER OF STATE FOR – Respondent


O R D E R

N.KIRUBAKARAN.J.

India is multi linguistic;

India is multi racial;

India is multi religious;

India is multi ethnic and India is multi cultural.

Unity in diversity represents India. When a country's masses have different cultural, linguistic, ethnic and religious identities, the same shall be maintained and protected in the interest of the unity of our great country. If Any attempt is made to disturb or destroy or interfere with any of the aforesaid issues, especially languages, it could become a sensitive issue. During freedom struggle, many leaders of our country, have shed blood, lost their lives, undergone incarceration and sacrificed their properties and profession, out of patriotism, for our motherland. Their sacrifices would be honoured only by respecting the identities of the citizens. Be it language, race, religion or region, any discrimination would definitely cause an uprising in the society which may lead to splitting of the country which should be avoided. Any kind of fanaticism is not good for any society. Fanaticism, in any form, is to be condemned, if it is exhibited. Linguistic fanaticism is more dangerous as it would give an impression that one language alone

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top