SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 33381

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
DHARSHAN @ PAIPAR – Appellant
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE CUM – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside and revise the order dated 08.04.2019 passed by the firstrespondent in C.No.07/Sec.Pro/DC.AN/2019 in V1 Villivakkam P.S.C.No.01 /Inspr.

V1PS / Sec.Pro./2019 u/s.107 Cr.P.C.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had involved in cases in Crime No.1459 of 2017 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 302 IPC, Crime No.1461 of 2017 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 336, 427, 392, 397 r/w 307 IPC and in Crime No.1085 of 2018 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 506(ii) 392 IPC r/w 397 IPC and subsequently he released on bail. While the cases were pending, the petitioner was asked to execute a bond under section 107 Cr.P.C to maintain peace. Accordingly he executed the bond. During the pendency of the bond, the petitioner again involved in another offence and thereby, a case in Crime No.151 of 2019 was registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 392, 397, 506(ii) IPC r/w.3 of TNPPDL Act. The firstrespondent initiated proceedings under section 122(1)(b) Cr.P.C based on the report filed by the second respondent and t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top