ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside and revise the order dated 08.04.2019 passed by the firstrespondent in C.No.07/Sec.Pro/DC.AN/2019 in V1 Villivakkam P.S.C.No.01 /Inspr.

V1PS / Sec.Pro./2019 u/s.107 Cr.P.C.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had involved in cases in Crime No.1459 of 2017 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 302 IPC, Crime No.1461 of 2017 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 336, 427, 392, 397 r/w 307 IPC and in Crime No.1085 of 2018 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 506(ii) 392 IPC r/w 397 IPC and subsequently he released on bail. While the cases were pending, the petitioner was asked to execute a bond under section 107 Cr.P.C to maintain peace. Accordingly he executed the bond. During the pendency of the bond, the petitioner again involved in another offence and thereby, a case in Crime No.151 of 2019 was registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 392, 397, 506(ii) IPC r/w.3 of TNPPDL Act. The firstrespondent initiated proceedings under section 122(1)(b) Cr.P.C based on the report filed by the second respondent and the petitioner was produced before the firstrespondent and after enquiry, the first respondent passed an order by cancelling the bond and sentenced him to undergo the remaining bond period. Challenging the said order of cancellation of bail bond, the present revision has been filed by the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner had involved in various cases in Crime No.1459 of 2017, Crime No.1085 of 2018 and Crime No.1085 of 2018 and he was granted bail and subsequently he executed a bond under Section 107 Cr.P.C to maintain good behavior. However, again the petitioner involved in another case in Crime No.151 of 2019 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 392, 397, 506(ii) IPC r/w.3 of TNPPDL Act and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody 05.04.2019. Since the petitioner breached the condition imposed in the bail order as well as in the bond executed under Section 107 Cr.P.C, the second respondent filed a report before the first respondent and after giving opportunity, the first respondent cancelled the bond executed by the petitioner under section 107 Cr.P.C and also sentenced the petitioner to undergo the remaining bond period. The first respondent was satisfied that during the bond period, the petitioner involved in another case and therefore prima facie found that the petitioner breached the bond and therefore, the proceedings was initiated under section 122(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. Therefore, there is no violation of Principles of Natural Justice and there is no merit in the revision.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

5. It is seen that the petitioner had involved in various cases in Crime No.1459 of 2017, Crime No.1085 of 2018 and Crime No.1085 of 2018 and he was granted bail and subsequently he executed a bond under Section 107 Cr.P.C to maintain good behavior and accordingly, he executed a bond. Thereafter, during bond period, the petitioner is alleged to have involved in another case in Crime No.151 of 2019 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 392, 397, 506(ii) IPC r/w.3 of TNPPDL Act and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody 05.04.2019. Subsequently, the proceedings under Section 122 (1)(b) Cr.P.C. was initiated by the firstrespondent and the Magistrate passed orders on 08.04.2019 by cancelling the bond executed by the petitioner under Section 107 Cr.P.C. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the revision before this Court.

6. A careful reading of the order passed by the first respondent shows that the first respondent, without applying his mind,