HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
S.ANUSUYA – Appellant
Versus
THINRUNEELAKANDAN – Respondent
The issue involved in both the Second Appeals are common and they arise out of a Common Judgment passed in A.S.No.8 of 2010 and A.S.No.16 of 2010, on the file of the Sub-Court, Poonamalee and hence both the Second Appeals are taken up together, heard and this Common Judgment is passed.
2.The appellant in S.A.No. 279 of 2014 filed a suit in O.S.No. 594 of 1998 against S.Anusuya and 2 others seeking for the relief of permanent injunction restraining them from in anyway trespassing or interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff with respect to the property situated in grama natham New S.No.135/17(Old S.No.82/1 Part) Measuring 4434 Sq.feet. The case of the appellant is that the suit property belonged to Pachaiyappa Pandithar by virtue of a Koorchit dated 25.4.1940 and he died intestate leaving behind his wife and son. The appellant is the son and his mother who is the wife of Pachaiyappa Pandithar was originally the plaintiff in the suit. Their grievance was that the said S. Anusuya and 2others were attempting to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the property and hence the suit came to be filed seeking for the relief of permanent i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.