O R D E R

This revision is preferred by a certain Peruvazhuthi challenging the judgment dismissing his Criminal Appeal No.21 of 2018, by which the learned Principal Sessions Judge has confirmed the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur in Crl.M.P.No.5457 of 2017 in C.C.No.12 of

2008.

2.1 The brief facts are :

● The revision petitioner / defacto complainant has lodged a complaint with Chetpet Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District, based on which, a case came to be registered in Crime No.156 of

2007. The allegations are: A3 is the mother of A4, and there were long-standing civil and criminal disputes between Peruvazhuthi, the defacto complainant and A3 and A4. At the instigation of A3 and A4, a certain Saravanan (A2) in the company of A-1 drove a tractor belonging to A4, and ran it over the property of Peruvazhuthi and caused damage to him.

● After completing the investigation, a final report was laid and accused were charge-sheeted for offences under Sections 447, 427, 506(ii) r/w. 109 IPC., ● Be that as it may, A1 and A3 had passed away, and the trial proceeded only against A2 and A4. On trial, the trial Court acquitted A4 and convicted A2 for offences under Section 447, 427