SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12046

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
SAMBOORANAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY – Respondent


O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

to quash the final report filed in C.C.No.284 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate–I, Thiruvannamalai for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 420, 506(1) I.P.C.

2.The crux of the allegation in the final report is that A1 has originally settled a land in Survey No.23/5 to an extent of 35.5 cents in favour of the defacto complainant on 20.07.1978 and after the settlement, the defacto complainant was in enjoyment of the said property. When the matter stood thus, A1 again settled the same property in favour of A2 and all other accused have colluded with A1 and jointly committed the said offence.

3.Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the very settlement deed which is a base for registration of F.I.R. indicates that A1 has settled the property with specific boundaries leaving the property which was already settled in favour of the defacto complainant. Now, the contention is that merely because the settlement was made in the year 1978 and since then some extent of land has been acquired by the Government, the defacto complainant has filed the present complaint. He

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top