SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 7285

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.39 of 2020 registered on the file of the Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai for the offences under Sections 294(b), 506(i) of IPC and Section 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000.

2. The learned Government Advocate(crl.side) as well as the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant would submit that no case for quashing has been made out.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner who is based in Malaysia had sent a highly offensive message over whatsapp to the defacto complainant's mobile.

4. The only question is whether sending such text will attract the offences mentioned in the FIR. Section 294(b) of IPC will be attracted only if a person to annoyance of others sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any public place. In this case, the petitioner is said to have sent an obscene text to the defacto complainant over whatsapp. Since the offence was not committed in or near any public place, Section

294(b) is not attracted.

5. Section 506(i) of IPC will be attracted, if a person is criminally intimidated. The Hon'ble Madras High Court, in the d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top