SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 19046

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Mr Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Shivnarayan Sabu – Appellant
Versus
Sabu Trade Private Limited – Respondent


ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order passed by the Principal District Judge, Salem, dismissing the petition filed by the revision petitioner/defendant seeking leave of the court to file additional written statement.

2. The respondent herein has filed a suit seeking declaration that it was the proprietor of the trademark/label SABU, injunction restraining the petitioner/defendant from infringing the trademark SABU and also for other incidental reliefs.

3. The revision petitioner herein filed a written statement and resisted the suit on various grounds. While the suit was pending, the revision petitioner filed a petition under Order 8 Rule 9 of CPC to receive additional written statement to raise certain further pleas which were not in the original written statement.

4. The court below dismissed the petition filed by the revision petitioner seeking leave of the court to file additional written statement by relying on time limit fixed under Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC for filing written statement. The court below in its impugned order has stated that as per the amended CPC applicable to the Commercial Courts, the outer time limit for filing a written statement is 120 da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top